Research/Place-based policy/

Study 01

03.01 · APA Economic Development Division · News & Views · 2026

Innovation Districts and Urban Economic Resilience: Lessons from Kendall Square

Yihao Wu

Illustrated public realm proposal in an urban innovation district

Research figure · Kendall Square and economic resilience

A study of how Kendall Square’s extraordinary technology growth has increased economic concentration, housing pressure, and vulnerability in supporting sectors.

+238%

Technology-services workforce

0.376

2023 concentration index

+25%

Median rent, 2020–23

Research question

Does deeper specialization make a globally successful innovation district more resilient—or more exposed to sector-specific shocks?

Approach

  1. Shift-share analysis of employment change in Kendall Square and the wider Massachusetts economy.
  2. Herfindahl–Hirschman Index tracking of local sector concentration.
  3. Fine-grained comparison of rents and service employment by distance from major campuses.

Principal findings

  • Technology-services employment grew 238 percent between 2020 and 2023.
  • Economic concentration rose from 0.346 to 0.376—well above the state average.
  • Nearby service jobs fell faster than those farther from major campuses as median rents rose 25 percent.

Why it matters

Innovation policy should pair cluster growth with economic diversification, affordable space, and protection for the supporting sectors that make an innovation ecosystem adaptive.

Read the APA feature
Return to the overviewExplore all research modules